Capital is voting with its feet: Foreign capital has never truly left. Every now and then, a wave of calls to "sell America" emerges in the market—geopolitical risks, fiscal deficits, overvaluation, policy uncertainty, and a variety of other reasons. But if you look at the capital flow data, you'll see a completely different story: foreign investors are still buying up US assets on a large scale.
This isn't about faith; it's about calculation. The fundamental advantages of the US capital market—its depth, liquidity, legal protection, and corporate profitability—remain unchanged. When other global markets experience increased volatility and slower growth, the US becomes the "least bad option"—or rather, the optimal option, even without the word "least bad."
For more related data and in-depth analysis, click below. OpenScore View the full analysis.
The US dollar's status as the global reserve currency is the ultimate anchor of this logic. Regardless of challenges from the euro, the renminbi, or other currencies, the US dollar consistently holds a far superior share of global central bank foreign exchange reserves. This isn't a unilateral push by the US, but rather a path dependence formed over decades in the global financial system—trade settlements, bond issuances, and commodity pricing are all denominated in US dollars, making it prohibitively expensive to bypass them.
Data Doesn't Lie: Foreign Investment Holdings: Continuous Inflow into US Assets; Dollar Reserve Status: The Undisputed Global Reserve Currency; Bearish Argument Accuracy: Repeatedly Provoked by the Market; Three Major Misjudgments by Bears: Reviewing Past Rounds of "Sell America" Narratives, You'll Find They All Made Similar Mistakes.
First, there's the confusion between short-term fluctuations and long-term trends. While US stocks do experience pullbacks, mistaking technical corrections for turning points is often wishful thinking. Markets aren't linear, but the logic behind long-term capital allocation is more stable than you might imagine.
Secondly, the power of "having no other choice" was underestimated. With sluggish growth in Europe, Japan mired in low interest rates, and high risk premiums in emerging markets, large global institutions needed to find ways to channel their money. The attractiveness of the US market was not gained by suppressing competitors, but by others falling behind.
Third, the understanding of the dollar system remains superficial. The strength of the dollar is not just a product of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy, but also a product of the entire global financial infrastructure. This system has inertia and network effects, and cannot be dismantled simply by shouting "de-dollarization."
Why do foreign investors still choose the US market? The depth and liquidity of the US stock and bond markets, their size, trading volume, and market-making network, offer unparalleled ease of entry and exit compared to other markets. Large funds need more than just returns; they also need the certainty of being able to "leave whenever they want."
The profitability, return on capital, and innovation capabilities of S&P 500 constituent stocks remain among the best globally. The competitive advantages of sectors like technology giants, pharmaceuticals, and finance cannot be replicated in just one or two years.
A mature legal system with sound property rights protection, transparent information disclosure, and protection of shareholder rights—these "soft infrastructure" elements are what long-term funds value most. Money can go anywhere, but only a few markets can provide a sense of security.
This isn't about faith; it's a victory of risk-reward ratio. Saying the US market "will never fall" is certainly wrong, but claiming "sell US" is a consensus is even more untenable. Foreign investors' choices are pragmatic: they're not betting on a grand narrative of the US, but rather comparing risk-adjusted returns globally, and finding that the US remains the highest-scoring option.
Bears can always find new reasons, but capital flows never lie. When you see yet another round of "this time is different" rhetoric, you might as well check international capital flow data, the trend of the US dollar index, and the structure of US Treasury holdings—those dry numbers are closer to the truth than any grand narrative.
Where does the common argument of "selling out America" come from?
Such views typically emerge when the United States faces short-term uncertainties—policy changes, geopolitical tensions, high valuations, and concerns about fiscal deficits. However, historical data shows that these arguments often only capture short-term fluctuations, ignoring the structural advantages of the US capital market and the practical constraints of global capital allocation.
What exactly does "continuous inflow" of foreign capital refer to?
This refers to the fact that net purchases of U.S. financial assets such as stocks and bonds by foreign investors have remained positive or at a high level. This is reflected in the U.S. Treasury Department's International Capital Flows (TIC) report, the foreign exchange reserve allocations of central banks around the world, and the holdings data of multinational asset management institutions. Even during periods of market volatility, this trend has not been substantially reversed.
Is the US dollar's status as the reserve currency truly unshakeable?
It is indeed difficult to shake in the short term. Although the proportion of the US dollar in global foreign exchange reserves has declined slightly, it still remains around 60%, far exceeding other currencies. More importantly, international trade settlement, commodity pricing, and cross-border financing are all deeply dependent on the US dollar system. This network effect and path dependence cannot be broken by the efforts of any single country or currency. In the long term, there are uncertainties, but a substitute needs to meet requirements in multiple aspects, including market depth, legal framework, and political stability.
Does that mean US stocks won't fall?
Of course, prices will fall; every market has cycles and fluctuations. This discussion focuses on medium- to long-term capital allocation logic and the status of the US as a global reserve currency, not short-term price predictions. Continued foreign capital inflows do not mean stock prices will only rise, but rather that the weight and attractiveness of the US market remain stable in the global asset allocation balance.
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Investing involves risk; please make your own decisions carefully and based on your individual circumstances.
